John 6: 51-58
Sunday 18th of August 2024
©Suzanne Grimmett
Gandhi once said, “There are so many hungry people in the world that God
could only come into the world in the form of food.”
In these weeks we have heard over and again from the Gospel of John that
Jesus is the bread of life. While we naturally associate the symbols of bread and
wine with Eucharist, we need to remember also that the 6th chapter of John’s
Gospel begins with the feeding of the five thousand. All of these words about
Jesus as bread follow an experience where the hungry were fed so abundantly
that there was plenty left over. Richard Rohr has said, “God comes to feed us
more than teach us. Lovers understand that.”[1]
When I read those words I thought of how true they are. Intimate partnerships
that are genuinely loving don’t think it is all about teaching their lover how to be
different or what they need to do to improve or what rules they should be
obeying to be acceptable. Truly loving relationships of mutuality genuinely want
the other to flourish- they want them to be fed with all they need to thrive.
But while we may embrace the truth of a God who feeds our hunger and sustains
us in life, this particular section of the discourses on bread is more confronting
than the previous sections, even to our modern ears. We can only imagine how to
a first century Jewish audience, the words of eating flesh and- worse still
drinking blood, must have sounded. There is the connection made by Jesus to
the bread that came down from heaven for the Israelites in the desert during the
Exodus, and a more hidden allusion to the craving of those in the wilderness for
meat instead of bread. (Numbers 11:13) It seems there is always more grace to be
found- the very body of God is offered for those who cry for flesh, but it will
prove to be food that satisfies for eternity.
But the language is hard, isn’t it? No wonder many turned away in Jesus’ day too.
Aside from the taboos around eating flesh and drinking blood, it is scandalously
intimate and physical. Yet we cannot miss the message that if God comes to us in
bread and in wine, then our body become united with God’s body, our being with
God’s being. We are to be transformed, from the inside out. We are dealing with a
great mystery.
We are perhaps living in an age which has struggled to deal with mystery.
Modernism, as Anne van Gend suggests, learnt to view the world as ‘an object to
be examined, dissected, used, and above all, controlled.’[2] She quotes Paul
Ricoeur saying, “We have turned mysteries to be pondered into problems to be
solved.” The problem is, where we have explained everything away, believing
that there is nothing beyond the reach of our understanding, we inadvertently lost
what matter most about being human. Turns out, “when you destroy a sense of
mystery,’ says Anne, “you take down meaning with it.”[3] This is reminiscent of
Wordsworth’s poem, The Tables Turned which shines a light on the mystery to be
found everywhere in creation, and the dangers of treating everything physical
like a cadaver on a scientific table where surgical probing might reveal all the
secrets of life;
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings;
Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:—
We murder to dissect.
From The Tables Turned, by William Wordsworth
When we look back on the many ways the Church throughout history has sought
to explain what happens in the Eucharist, we might recognise the same
reductionism that ends up robbing symbols of their power. I think there has been
a sense in contemporary culture to return to the power of mystery, but where it
appears today, it tends to be divorced from the material physical world. The
mysteries we speak of today are all a bit insubstantial or otherworldly. We point
to things that seem to be supernatural or spiritual- the physical world, having
been dissected and explained, apparently offers no further enchantment. What
Jesus life and teaching can do is return mystery to the natural rather than the
supernatural, joining the physical to the spiritual. Jesus continually used material
things to reveal the nature of God and communicate grace- bread and wine, trees
and seed, dirt and even spit. I think we would get closer to a spirituality that can
heal in our time if we allow the physical to again be joined with the spiritual, and
the whole world revealed to us as charged with the glory and mystery of God.
Recovering a way of seeing where we recognise the presence of God in all life is
not just about our individual spiritual journey. Peace in the world and care of the
planet depends on us developing a different way of seeing; one that appreciates
all creation teaching and sustaining us, rather than being seen as a commodity to
be used and marketed. In the previous century a scientistic view of relentless
human progress brought forth the horrors of social Darwinism, where some races
and groups of people were thought to be superior to others, and therefore of
greater value. When you look today in a world where there is sufficient
resources, yet famines are allowed to spread unchecked in certain parts of the
globe, and where whole peoples can be destroyed in military action, there is
evidence of that same twisted view that some groups are superior and others
more disposable. We live in a society that evaluates people in terms of their
function and usefulness, meaning that age and disability can reduce the worth
attributed and the respect shown. A lack of mystery and wonder, it seems, can
make us less human. Justice and peace require that we recover a sacramental
view of the universe.
So many, too, struggle for a sense of worth and dignity for other reasons. Worth
for many is found not in their inherent value as human beings and bearers of the
image of God, but on the social expectations they embrace and the arbitrary
definitions of success. Every time we believe this, we give power to those who
would see the world only in terms of a competition for success with profits to be
made. What if instead, our worth is found in the very mystery of our own
existence? That we, too, all of us, are bearers of God’s glory? The church has
sought at times to define terms of who may come to the table- who may receive
Christ in bread and in wine. But Jesus tells us something quite different. Jesus
tells us the terms are defined only by our hunger. God is the food that breaks into
our time, sustaining the hungry in life and joining us with the forever being of the
living Christ. The sacraments we have been given are a doorway between the
material world and the very being of God. It is a glimpse of what is more real
than real- but it is hidden in the very physicality of the earth…of our bodies…in
a mouthful of bread and sip of wine.
But we do need our hunger. Often those others would call sinners know their
hunger more than the righteous. Righteousness so easily become “self-
righteousness’ where we have no need. If we are sufficient unto ourselves,
assured of our own superiority, we have no need of another. We have no need of
God. To be hungry is to make room for the presence of the other
and for the mysterious reality that is God amongst us, present in all our
physicality.
Perhaps the last word should be with Wordsworth in the final words of his poem. As he refuses to give in to a world that has been fully explained away, devoid of wonder, he counsels…
Enough of Science and of Art;
Close up those barren leaves;
Come forth, and bring with you a heart
That watches and receives.
From The Tables Turned, by William Wordsworth
+Amen
[1] https://medium.com/future-faith/the-mystery-of-eucharist-6d8f2acc62d5
[2] Anne van Gend, Restoring the Story: The Good News of Atonement, (London,SCM: 2024) p185
[3] Anne van Gend, Restoring the Story, p 185